Core principles
We prioritize compliance, accuracy, transparency, user safety and usefulness before conversion. We do not fabricate studies, ratings, credentials, testimonials or product facts.
Source hierarchy
- Current product label and official transactional terms;
- Government and recognized public-health resources;
- Peer-reviewed research, interpreted with its limitations;
- Manufacturer statements, clearly attributed as claims;
- Secondary sources used for context, not as sole proof.
Evaluation criteria
| Criterion | What we examine |
|---|---|
| Formula transparency | Forms, amounts, blends and serving clarity |
| Evidence quality | Study design, relevance, population and limitations |
| Label clarity | Directions, warnings and other ingredients |
| Value | Cost per serving and comparable documentation |
| Purchase transparency | Seller, billing, shipping and support |
| Guarantee clarity | Eligibility, process, deadlines and exclusions |
| Consumer considerations | Uncertainty, interactions and professional guidance |
Scores and rankings
We do not publish fabricated numerical ratings. Any future ranking must disclose inclusion criteria, comparison date, products reviewed and how commercial relationships are handled.
Updates and corrections
Dates change only after a meaningful review or revision. Pricing, formula, availability and merchant terms should be checked periodically. Material corrections should be made promptly and transparently.
Medical review
We do not claim medical review unless a qualified, identifiable professional has actually completed it. Editorial content is not medical advice.
Affiliate independence
An affiliate relationship may affect whether a link can generate revenue, but should not change label facts, safety cautions or evidence conclusions.